Lozano, A. M. et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 148–160 (2019).
Habets, J. G. V. et al. An update on adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 33, 1834–1843 (2018).
Halje, P. et al. Oscillations in cortico-basal ganglia circuits: implications for Parkinson’s disease and other neurologic and psychiatric conditions. J. Neurophysiol. 122, 203–231 (2019).
Horn, A. et al. Connectivity Predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 82, 67–78 (2017).
Horn, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation induced normalization of the human functional connectome in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 142, 3129–3143 (2019).
Kahan, J. et al. Resting state functional MRI in Parkinson’s disease: the impact of deep brain stimulation on ‘effective’ connectivity. Brain 137, 1130–1144 (2014).
Jech, R. & Mueller, K. Investigating network effects of DBS with fMRI. In Connectomic Deep Brain Stimulation 275–301 (Elsevier, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821861-7.00026-9.
Younce, J. R. et al. Resting‐State Functional Connectivity Predicts STN DBS Clinical Response. Mov. Disord. 36, 662–671 (2021).
Shen, L. et al. Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Modulates 2 Distinct Neurocircuits. Ann. Neurol. 88, 1178–1193 (2020).
Michel, C. M., Koenig, T. & Brandeis, D. Electrical Neuroimaging. Electrical Neuroimaging (Cambridge University Press, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596889
Giannicola, G. et al. The effects of levodopa and ongoing deep brain stimulation on subthalamic beta oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 226, 120–127 (2010).
Bočková, M. et al. Suboptimal response to STN-DBS in Parkinson’s disease can be identified via reaction times in a motor cognitive paradigm. J. Neural Transm. 127, 1579–1588 (2020).
Hirschmann, J. et al. A direct relationship between oscillatory subthalamic nucleus–cortex coupling and rest tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 136, 3659–3670 (2013).
Bočková, M. et al. Cortical network organization reflects clinical response to subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 5626–5635 (2021).
Michel, C. M. & Koenig, T. EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: A review. Neuroimage 180, 577–593 (2018).
Khanna, A., Pascual-Leone, A., Michel, C. M. & Farzan, F. Microstates in resting-state EEG: Current status and future directions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 49, 105–113 (2015).
Bréchet, L. et al. Capturing the spatiotemporal dynamics of self-generated, task-initiated thoughts with EEG and fMRI. Neuroimage 194, 82–92 (2019).
Britz, J., Van De Ville, D. & Michel, C. M. BOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics. Neuroimage 52, 1162–1170 (2010).
Rajkumar, R. et al. Comparison of EEG microstates with resting state fMRI and FDG-PET measures in the default mode network via simultaneously recorded trimodal (PET/MR/EEG) data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24429
Custo, A. et al. Electroencephalographic Resting-State Networks: Source Localization of Microstates. Brain Connect 7, 671–682 (2017).
Lamoš, M., Morávková, I., Ondráček, D., Bočková, M. & Rektorová, I. Altered Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Resting Brain in Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy Bodies. Mov. Disord. 36, 2435–2440 (2021).
Nishida, K. et al. EEG microstates associated with salience and frontoparietal networks in frontotemporal dementia, schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Neurophysiol. 124, 1106–1114 (2013).
Pal, A., Behari, M., Goyal, V. & Sharma, R. Study of EEG microstates in Parkinson’s disease: a potential biomarker? Cogn. Neurodyn 15, 463–471 (2021).
Schumacher, J. et al. Dysfunctional brain dynamics and their origin in Lewy body dementia. Brain 142, 1767–1782 (2019).
Sverak, T., Albrechtova, L., Lamos, M., Rektorova, I. & Ustohal, L. Intensive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation changes EEG microstates in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Schizophr. Res. 193, 451–452 (2018).
Koenig, T. et al. A deviant EEG brain microstate in acute, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenics at rest. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 249, 205–211 (1999).
Chu, C. et al. Spatiotemporal EEG microstate analysis in drug-free patients with Parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage Clin. 25, 102132 (2020).
Serrano, J. I. et al. EEG Microstates Change in Response to Increase in Dopaminergic Stimulation in Typical Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Front. Neurosci. 12, 1–9 (2018).
Li, Z. et al. Dysfunctional Brain Dynamics of Parkinson’s Disease and the Effect of Acute Deep Brain Stimulation. Front. Neurosci. 15, 1–11 (2021).
Kühn, A. A., Kupsch, A., Schneider, G.-H. & Brown, P. Reduction in subthalamic 8-35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 1956–1960 (2006).
Brown, P. Bad oscillations in Parkinson’s disease. In Parkinson’s Disease and Related Disorders 27–30 (Springer Vienna, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-45295-0_6.
Cagnan, H., Denison, T., McIntyre, C. & Brown, P. Emerging technologies for improved deep brain stimulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1024–1033 (2019).
Bočková, M. & Rektor, I. Electrophysiological biomarkers for deep brain stimulation outcomes in movement disorders: state of the art and future challenges. J. Neural Transm. 128, 1169–1175 (2021).
Telkes, I. et al. Local field potentials of subthalamic nucleus contain electrophysiological footprints of motor subtypes of Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, E8567–E8576 (2018).
Bouthour, W. et al. Biomarkers for closed-loop deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease and beyond. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 343–352 (2019).
Little, S. et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 74, 449–457 (2013).
Little, S. et al. Bilateral adaptive deep brain stimulation is effective in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87, 717–721 (2016).
Rosa, M. et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in a freely moving parkinsonian patient. Mov. Disord. 30, 1003–1005 (2015).
Bočková, M. & Rektor, I. Impairment of brain functions in Parkinson’s disease reflected by alterations in neural connectivity in EEG studies: A viewpoint. Clin. Neurophysiol. 130, 239–247 (2019).
Geraedts, V. J. et al. Preoperative Electroencephalography-Based Machine Learning Predicts Cognitive Deterioration After Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation. Mov. Disord. 36, 2324–2334 (2021).
Bréchet, L., Brunet, D., Perogamvros, L., Tononi, G. & Michel, C. M. EEG microstates of dreams. Sci. Rep. 10, 17069 (2020).
Oswal, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation modulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 139, 1482–1496 (2016).
Kikuchi, M. et al. Native EEG and treatment effects in neuroleptic-naïve schizophrenic patients: Time and frequency domain approaches. Schizophr. Res. 97, 163–172 (2007).
Aron, A. R., Behrens, T. E., Smith, S., Frank, M. J. & Poldrack, R. A. Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI. J. Neurosci. 27, 3743–3752 (2007).
Litvak, V. et al. Resting oscillatory cortico-subthalamic connectivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 134, 359–374 (2011).
Brown, P. Oscillatory nature of human basal ganglia activity: Relationship to the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 18, 357–363 (2003).
Eusebio, A. et al. Deep brain stimulation can suppress pathological synchronisation in parkinsonian patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 82, 569–573 (2011).
Whitmer, D. et al. High frequency deep brain stimulation attenuates subthalamic and cortical rhythms in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 1–18 (2012).
Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004).
Brunet, D., Murray, M. M. & Michel, C. M. Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 813870 (2011).
Michel, C. M. & Brunet, D. EEG Source Imaging: A Practical Review of the Analysis Steps. Front. Neurol. 10, 1–18 (2019).
Seeber, M. et al. Subcortical electrophysiological activity is detectable with high-density EEG source imaging. Nat. Commun. 10, 753 (2019).